Facebook-f Instagram Youtube
Join Telegram

Multi-Tiered Oversight: Affidavit Clarifies NCERT Judiciary Chapter Review

The latest affidavit by educationist Suparna Diwakar marks a significant shift in the ongoing legal battle over the now-banned Class 8 NCERT Social Science textbook. Her statements directly challenge the narrative of “individual authorship” and “procedural bypass” that led to the blacklisting of three experts by the Supreme Court earlier this year.

Why in News

  • Educationist Suparna Diwakar filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court regarding a controversial Class 8 textbook chapter on judicial corruption.
  • She asserted the chapter was reviewed at the “highest institutional level” within NCERT, including by the Director and the Department of Education in Social Sciences (DESS).
  • Claims final authority rested with the National Syllabus and Teaching Learning Material Committee (NSTC) and the Oversight Committee (NOC), not individuals.
  • Contradicts the NCERT Director’s earlier claim that the textbook was not placed before the NSTC.

Impact

  • Economic:  [NOT RELEVANT]
  • Social: Highlights the “institutional responsibility” in shaping the civilizational and legal consciousness of students.
  • Policy: Questions the “contractual” nature of expertise used by the state and the degree of oversight in curriculum framing.
  • Ecological:  [NOT RELEVANT]

GS Paper Focus

GS-2 — Governance: Issues relating to development and management of Social Sector/Services relating to Education.

Policies & Schemes

  1. National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCF-SE), 2023.
  2. National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT) Oversight Protocols.

System-level Insight

The NCERT controversy reveals the “Diffusion of Accountability” within high-level bureaucratic bodies. By designating the process as “multi-tiered” and “facilitative,” the state and its experts create an environment where specific authorial responsibility is submerged under committee mandates, making it difficult for the judiciary to assign direct liability for controversial content.

Interview Angle

Should individual experts be held legally ‘personally liable‘ for content in state-approved textbooks, or should institutional oversight committees bear the sole responsibility? Discuss in the light of the 2026 NCERT affidavit.

Vocabulary

  1. Liaising — acting as a link between two groups — Basic
  2. Facilitatory — helping to make a process possible or easier — Intermediate
  3. Multi-tiered — organized in several levels — Basic
  4. Authorial — relating to the author of a work — Intermediate
  5. Evaluative — involving the assessment of the value of something — Basic